Description
Please provide a synopsis of the attached Fed Chairman’s January 30th 2019 September 18th 2019 January 29th 2020 Sept 19 2020 Please provide an overall summary of the Federal Reserve’s Chair Press Conferences Include in your analysis “The COVID-19 pandemic is causing tremendous human and economic hardship across the United States and around the world. Economic activity and employment have picked up in recent months but remain well below their levels at the beginning of the year. Weaker demand and significantly lower oil prices are holding down consumer price inflation. Overall financial conditions have improved in recent months, in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses. ” & also “My colleagues and I have one overarching goal: to sustain the economic expansion, with a strong job market and stable prices, for the benefit of the American people. ” How is this central objective achieved. What was the FOMC’s decision in each case. What is the state of employment and inflation in the US economy. What was the FOMC’s most recent decision. How similar and how different was the press conference of the Fed chairperson after the meeting? Elaborate on at least four subject matters that he presented. Elaborate on at least three pertinent questions that the press asked. Elaborate on the FOMC’s role in setting and implementing monetary policy. Explain the mechanism of a rate cut by the FOMC and its impact, if any, in the US economy. How is the federal reserve trying to effect the financial markets and the economy as a whole? What was its policy prior and what is it after the 2020 pandemic? FOMCpresconf20190130 FED.pdf https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcpresconf20190619.htm https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20190918.pdf https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20190918a.htm Quality of Assignment Content — Levels of Achievement: Quality of assignment content Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Submission does not display an understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Minimal 0.42 (42.00%) points Submission demonstrates a minimal understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Competent 0.49 (49.00%) points Submission demonstrates some understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Effective 0.595 (59.50%) points Submission demonstrates a general understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Master 0.7 (70.00%) points Submission demonstrates a full understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Mechanics and Readability of Assignment — Levels of Achievement: Mechanics and Readability of assignment Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in all literacy standards. Assignment is not understandable to the reader. Frequent errors in spelling and capitalization: profound and/or inaccurate punctuation which render the submission unreadable. Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in most literacy standards. Assignment is unclear and not understandable to the reader. Contains many and serious intrusive errors of punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization which partially inhibit readability. Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in some areas of literacy standards. Assignment is partially clear and understandable to the reader. Contains several punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors, but does not inhibit readability. Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points Writing demonstrates mastery of most criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is mostly clear and understandable to the reader. Contains only occasional punctuation, spelling, and /or capitalization errors. Master 0.15 (15.00%) points Writing demonstrates mastery of all criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is clearly understandable to the reader. Free of punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. Structure and Organization/ Format/ Presentation of Assignment — Levels of Achievement: Structure And Organization/ format/ presentation of assignment Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Submission is not appropriate for assignment. Does not follow directions as indicated by instructor. References and citations are not included if requested. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points Submission follows minimal directions and is missing many components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are not included and/or properly cited. Errors in format several interfere with meaning, formatting weak. Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points Submission does not follow all directions and is missing some components indicated in the instructions. If requested, some references are included and partially cited properly. Several errors in formatting, or format is inconsistent. Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points Submission follows directions and includes most components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and mostly cited properly. Few formatting errors. Master 0.15 (15.00%) points Submission follows direction and includes all components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited. Appropriate format and presentation for assignment. Quality of Assignment Content — Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Submission does not display an understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Minimal 0.42 (42.00%) points Submission demonstrates a minimal understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Competent 0.49 (49.00%) points Submission demonstrates some understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Effective 0.595 (59.50%) points Submission demonstrates a general understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Master 0.7 (70.00%) points Submission demonstrates a full understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment. Mechanics and Readability of Assignment — Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in all literacy standards. Assignment is not understandable to the reader. Frequent errors in spelling and capitalization: profound and/or inaccurate punctuation which render the submission unreadable. Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in most literacy standards. Assignment is unclear and not understandable to the reader. Contains many and serious intrusive errors of punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization which partially inhibit readability. Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in some areas of literacy standards. Assignment is partially clear and understandable to the reader. Contains several punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors, but does not inhibit readability. Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points Writing demonstrates mastery of most criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is mostly clear and understandable to the reader. Contains only occasional punctuation, spelling, and /or capitalization errors. Master 0.15 (15.00%) points Writing demonstrates mastery of all criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is clearly understandable to the reader. Free of punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. Structure and Organization/ Format/ Presentation of Assignment — Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points Submission is not appropriate for assignment. Does not follow directions as indicated by instructor. References and citations are not included if requested. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points Submission follows minimal directions and is missing many components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are not included and/or properly cited. Errors in format several interfere with meaning, formatting weak. Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points Submission does not follow all directions and is missing some components indicated in the instructions. If requested, some references are included and partially cited properly. Several errors in formatting, or format is inconsistent. Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points Submission follows directions and includes most components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and mostly cited properly. Few formatting errors. Master 0.15 (15.00%) points Submission follows direction and includes all components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited. Appropriate format and presentation for assignment.Levels of Achievement:
Order with us today for a quality custom paper on the above topic or any other topic!
What Awaits you:
• High Quality custom-written papers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality