Discuss how the difference between judicial activism and judicial restraint affect the law. Use specific current examples from the popular press and/or the field of homeland security. Discuss such topics as: Has the manner in which a law has been interpreted by the Court changed the dynamic of the law itself? Is there a law that the Court has not interpreted but could in the future which could be affected by activism or restraint? Conduct your discussion without being political but instead sticking to the legalities of the issues

error: Content is protected !!