Analyse the factors which have led to increased immigration to the UK in recent years.

COURSE CODE MENTR304-ONL01263COURSENAMEStrategic Management of Growth & ExitTaskbrief & rubricsTaskMid-termDescription: You are required to develop the question for a specific case study asset out in the guideline below. Make sure you have a good balance between describing your case study and analysing it.The reportshould begin with an overview (abstract) of thecase study problem that discusses the importance of the topic and puts it in a relevantcontext of ourcourseYour report should be 2,500 words, excluding Title, Abstract, Table of contents, Bibliography and Appendices. Read the case study carefully (Mid-Term Evaluation Submission Case study.pdf) and answer in no more than 2500words the following questions.1. Explain the purpose and benefits of PEST analysis. 2. Outline the factors that could lead to exploitation of migrant workers. 3. Analyse the factors which have led to increased immigration to the UK in recent years. 4. Evaluate the extent to which the UK economy benefits from migrant labourFormalities:•Wordcount: 2.500•Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.•Font: Arial 12,5 pts. •Text alignment: Justified.•The in-text Referencesand the Bibliography have tobe in Harvard’s citation style.Submission:Week (5) –Via Moodle (Turnitin). Week 5 (Sunday 24th, May)23:59Weight:This task is a 40% of your total grade for this subject.It assesses the following learning outcomes:•Outcome 1: Critically evaluate strategic management theories•Outcome 2: Assess the utility and limitations of various strategic management theories.

RubricsExceptional 90-100Good 80-89Fair 70-79Marginal fail 60-69Knowledge & Understanding (20%)Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.Application (30%)Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.Critical Thinking (30%)Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.Communication (20%)Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheckStudent communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheckStudent communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident.Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident.