Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that addresses the assessment and influence of culture as it relates to the development of a diverse global group of employees. Include the following in your paper:
A research-supported discussion of available cultural assessment tools. How might these tools be applied to assess the organizational culture and identify cultural gaps within the group? (Benchmarks C3.5: Select and apply tools to assess organizational cultures.)
A research-supported discussion of how the social culture of this group will likely influence workplace outcomes and group productivity.
A research-supported discussion of how the social culture and diversity of the individuals on the team will influence the greater organizational culture. (Benchmarks C3.1: Recognize the influence of social culture and diversity on organizational culture.)
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Review the article by Cater, Lang, and Szabo (2013).
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
LDR-804 LDR-804-O500 Benchmark – Assessment and Influence of Culture 215.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (87.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%)
Criteria 100.0%
Research-Supported Discussion of Available Cultural Assessment Tools (Benchmarks C3.5: Select and apply tools to assess organizational cultures.) 25.0% A research-supported description of available cultural assessment tools is not present. An incomplete or inaccurate description of available cultural assessment tools is presented. Research support is not present. A cursory description of available cultural assessment tools is presented. Some sources are not scholarly. A reasonable description of available cultural assessment tools is presented. All sources are scholarly though some are outdated. A thorough description of available cultural assessment tools is presented. All sources are scholarly and current.
Research-Supported Description of How Social Culture of the Group Will Influence Workplace Outcomes and Productivity 20.0% A research-supported description of how social culture of the group will influence workplace outcomes and productivity is not present. An incomplete or inaccurate description of how social culture of the group will influence workplace outcomes and productivity is presented. Research support is not present. A cursory description of how social culture of the group will influence workplace outcomes and productivity is presented. Some sources are not scholarly. A reasonable description of how social culture of the group will influence workplace outcomes and productivity is presented. All sources are scholarly though some are outdated. A thorough description of how social culture of the group will influence workplace outcomes and productivity is presented. All sources are scholarly and current.
Description of How Social Culture and Diversity of Individuals Will Influence Organizational Culture (Benchmarks C3.1: Recognize the influence of social culture and diversity on organizational culture.) 25.0% A research-supported description of how social culture and diversity of individuals will influence organizational culture is not present. An incomplete or inaccurate description of how social culture and diversity of individuals will influence organizational culture is presented. Research support is not present. A cursory description of how social culture and diversity of individuals will influence organizational culture is presented. Some sources are not scholarly. A reasonable description of how social culture and diversity of individuals will influence organizational culture is presented. All sources are scholarly though some are outdated. A thorough description of how social culture and diversity of individuals will influence organizational culture is presented. All sources are scholarly and current.
Synthesis and Argument 10.0% No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Criteria 5Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Do You Know That our Professional Writers are on Stand-by to Provide you with the Most Authentic Custom Paper. Order with us Today and Enjoy an Irresistible Discount!